hellotoast is funny.

hellotoast (5:16:24 AM): there’s a point of diminishing marginal utility juddietuna (5:16:32 AM): hahahaha juddietuna (5:17:02 AM): wait a moment as a parse “diminishing marginal utility” juddietuna (5:17:08 AM): i think the longest repeated substring is “in” hellotoast (5:17:16 AM): hahahaha hellotoast (5:17:18 AM): omg don’t do that juddietuna (5:17:24 AM): “do” hellotoast (5:17:24 AM): omg juddietuna (5:17:27 AM): “” hellotoast (5:17:29 AM): now i’m doing it everywhere! hellotoast (5:17:37 AM): noooo! juddietuna (5:17:40 AM): “ooo” juddietuna (5:17:48 AM): BWAHAHAHAHAA hellotoast (5:17:48 AM): alk;je4oibjliaejrlaksjlkvnalkejrlkesjriae juddietuna (5:17:51 AM): uh hellotoast (5:17:52 AM): =P juddietuna (5:17:56 AM): i don’t feel like it anymore juddietuna (5:18:00 AM): Segmentation Fault hellotoast (5:18:04 AM): hahaha hellotoast (5:18:09 AM): that’s not going to fly with the autograder judy juddietuna (5:18:20 AM): hahhahaa juddietuna (5:18:29 AM): rm -rf autograder juddietuna (5:18:36 AM): take THAT! hellotoast (5:18:37 AM): hahahahahaha hellotoast (5:18:40 AM): hahahaha juddietuna (5:18:45 AM): I WIN!!! hellotoast (5:18:53 AM): sock it to ‘em judy!

hellotoast (5:27:48 AM): crap judy i just found a bug in my 170 program juddietuna (5:27:55 AM): OH NO hellotoast (5:27:59 AM): which you inadvertently pointed out to me juddietuna (5:28:06 AM): ??!?? hellotoast (5:28:11 AM): when i said “omg” hellotoast (5:28:13 AM): you said “” hellotoast (5:28:27 AM): and i realized that my program doesn’t work when there’s no substring!

hellotoast (5:40:24 AM): this assignment was crazy hellotoast (5:40:29 AM): i was very enthralled by it juddietuna (5:40:30 AM): it’s fun though hellotoast (5:40:36 AM): i couldn’t stop thinking about it juddietuna (5:40:48 AM): write it a sonnet hellotoast (5:41:03 AM): hahaha hellotoast (5:41:29 AM): do you think anyone has ever written a serious sonnett about computer science? hellotoast (5:41:43 AM): i don’t think it’s psychologically possible

i love cs!

Sir Dobel (5:56:27 AM): I’m reading a paper which gives a mathematical analysis of the rubik’s cube using group theory! Sir Dobel (5:56:55 AM): earlier I was starting to program my 4d rubik’s cube program….but I started getting a little confused juddietuna (5:57:03 AM): 4d?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?! juddietuna (5:57:07 AM): how does that even work?!?!?!?! Sir Dobel (5:57:56 AM): about exactly how to represent the 4-dimensions…..I think it’s representable by 4 3-d cubes…the only problem being that you have to be able to see the inner cubits as well as the outer ones….because just as the “inside” of 2d objects are on the surface of 3d objects, so are the “insides” of 3d objects on the surface of 4d objects juddietuna (5:58:12 AM): oh my god Sir Dobel (5:58:37 AM): the problem is you can’t really use your geometric intuition…so I need to develop a purely formal representation for 3d rubik’s cube, and then I think it will be clear how to extend that to the 4th dimension